From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 2 14:31:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8189D16A41F for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 14:31:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from postfix4-2.free.fr (postfix4-2.free.fr [213.228.0.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F051843D45 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 14:31:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (vol75-8-82-233-239-98.fbx.proxad.net [82.233.239.98]) by postfix4-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1F130ED9A for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 16:31:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: by tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A7857405B; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 16:31:46 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 16:31:45 +0200 From: Jeremie Le Hen To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20050802143145.GI68965@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <20050727114821.GS1610@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050727143941.GA7172@soaustin.net> <20050727161412.GT1610@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050727161412.GT1610@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: Jeremie Le Hen Subject: Re: developpers-handbook: tools-intro is incorrect X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 14:31:28 -0000 Hi list, > I attached two patches with this mail. The first one removes the > innuendo saying that Perl still belongs to FreeBSD source tree. > > The second one improves the advocacy for FreeBSD by giving some examples > of common compilers and interpreters available from ports. > > Feel free to use whatever you want, that's just my 2 cents. Does the first patch have a chance to get commited ? I won't be offended if the second one is redirected to /dev/null, but since the first one corrects a mistake in the developper handbook, it should not be lost, IMHO. Best regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >