From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Sep 21 02:54:10 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA09040 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Mon, 21 Sep 1998 02:54:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hosting.doublesquare.com (hosting.doublesquare.com [195.5.128.151]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA08938 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 1998 02:53:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ark@eltex.ru) From: ark@eltex.ru Received: from eltex.ru (eltex-spiiras.nw.ru [195.19.204.46] (may be forged)) by hosting.doublesquare.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA00782; Mon, 21 Sep 1998 13:51:59 +0400 (MSD) Received: from paranoid.eltex.spb.ru (root@border.eltex.ru [195.19.198.2]) by eltex.ru (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA04867; Mon, 21 Sep 1998 13:52:15 +0400 (MSD) Received: (from ark@localhost) by paranoid.eltex.spb.ru (8.8.8/8.7.3) id NAA32644; Mon, 21 Sep 1998 13:51:23 +0400 Date: Mon, 21 Sep 1998 13:51:23 +0400 Message-Id: <199809210951.NAA32644@paranoid.eltex.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <9809192115.ZM18727@beatrice.rutgers.edu> from ""Allen Smith" " Organization: "Klingon Imperial Intelligence Service" Subject: Re: Packet/traffic shapper ? To: easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu Cc: luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it, kev@lab321.ru, (Eugeny,Kuzakov), mike@smith.net.au, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, ipfilter@postbox.anu.edu.au Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- nuqneH, ALTQ is damn ugly. I'd prefer to see something like dummynet interacting with IPFilter instead of ipfw. "Allen Smith" said : > On Sep 12, 9:46pm, Luigi Rizzo (possibly) wrote: > > shouldn't take too much to patch ipfilter to return a different action > > than pass/drop and thus cause packets to be passed through the > > bw limiter. > > I've taken a look at getting ALTQ and ipfilter to work > together. However, the most obvious way to get ipfilter to interface > with ALTQ (namely, having ipfilter figure out under which ALTQ class > packets should go, so that you're not examining the packets twice) > unfortunately has the problem that the ALTQ classes are only > distinguished via a human-comprehensible form (numbering) until they > go into the kernel; they're then no longer numbered. Otherwise, you > could just have an ipfilter action to put them into the appropriate > class via an added mbuf field or whatever. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ {::} {::} {::} CU in Hell _| o |_ | | _|| | / _||_| |_ |_ |_ (##) (##) (##) /Arkan#iD |_ o _||_| _||_| / _| | o |_||_||_| [||] [||] [||] Do i believe in Bible? Hell,man,i've seen one! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBNgYhmqH/mIJW9LeBAQFEgQP/Xkp5GsGEHoQunvk8xs5A+/xMZKc3GXhK nJ0W5sAmnw6A5tR5GolVBvkMryG2sltPOVRFAzyNsaVfsTYliV1SZhF+eZMmRu5I PfIYfTkh4mil2VixH3Y4FcJafnNNyJRSXJeWGGzcu8dNwVbk4I+fqPw5jG2FRZ5G Ap3k+b0Innw= =2uNZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message