From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 17 13:41:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D96106566C; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:41:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itetcu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (worf.ds9.tecnik93.com [81.196.207.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 768098FC1E; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:41:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from User-PC (unknown [81.181.146.246]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BDFA222C55B2; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:41:44 +0300 (EEST) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:41:44 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Sahil Tandon Message-Id: <20110617164144.46f66628.itetcu@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: References: <201106162238.p5GMcfrV085514@repoman.freebsd.org> <20110616231146.GA19139@magic.hamla.org> <4DFA940C.2030909@missouri.edu> <20110616234556.GB19139@magic.hamla.org> <20110617110711.3c4f8e3a.itetcu@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Maho NAKATA , Sahil Tandon , Stephen Montgomery-Smith , "cvs-all@FreeBSD.org" , "ports-committers@FreeBSD.org" , Stephen Montgomery-Smith , "gabor@FreeBSD.org" , "cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/astro/orsa Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:41:46 -0000 On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:38:54 -0400 Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Jun 17, 2011, at 4:07 AM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > > On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:45:57 -0400 > > Sahil Tandon wrote: > > > >>> Should one wait a day or so before committing the bumps to avoid > >>> certain "race" conditions with tinderbox, where it might build the port > >>> requiring the dependent before rebuilding the dependent? > > To be clear for posterity, although it may appear that way given the quoting, I did not write the above question, Stephen did. :) Of course, hence To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith and Cc'ing his mentors. -- Ion-Mihai Tetcu