From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jan 7 8:36:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from tricord.system.pl (tricord.system.pl [195.205.185.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0498714DA3; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 08:36:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from saper@system.pl) Received: from localhost (saper@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tricord.system.pl (SYSTEM Internet) with ESMTP id RAA02758; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 17:35:52 +0100 (MET) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 17:35:45 +0100 (MET) From: Marcin Cieslak To: sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp Cc: asami@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPv6-enable ports In-Reply-To: <200001071502.AAA46153@prince.net.ebina.hitachi.co.jp> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp wrote: > asami> That sounds fine, but what about packages? They will all be built > asami> without IPv6 support, right? > > I think It should synchronize default kernel configuration. If kernel > is enabled IPv6 in default, the packages should be build with IPv6 > support. Well, I suppose that Satoshi meant the packages that go to CD-ROM for casual first-time FreeBSD user :), not those build by those, who might have already added "USE_INET6" or whatever to their /etc/make.conf. -- << Marcin Cieslak // saper@system.pl >> ----------------------------------------------------------------- SYSTEM Internet Provider http://www.system.pl To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message