From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 4 16:25:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790CE106564A for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:25:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dirkx@webweaving.org) Received: from pikmeer.webweaving.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1af8:4100:b040::20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149518FC0A for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:25:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (188.28.49.60.threembb.co.uk [188.28.49.60]) (authenticated bits=0) by pikmeer.webweaving.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p94GNPQ1004266 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:23:56 GMT (envelope-from dirkx@webweaving.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik In-Reply-To: <20111004160043.GA16034@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 17:26:45 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20111004160043.GA16034@lpthe.jussieu.fr> To: Michel Talon X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.5 (pikmeer.webweaving.org [178.18.23.51]); Tue, 04 Oct 2011 16:23:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does anyone use nscd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 16:25:03 -0000 On 4 Oct 2011, at 17:00, Michel Talon wrote: > Des wrote: >> Does anyone actually use nscd? >=20 > I am using it since a lot of time. I have not experienced annoying = bugs > in all that time. The last time i have been hit is when installing = some > new softs which require adding some user and some group with pw. Of > course this doesn't work well with caching these data, and i had > completely forgotten i was using a cache. This is very perplexing. Same here. It just works. And you forget about it. But always beware = that it caches - and that caching is not system wide - but per user. And = I've seen a few cases where I suspect it serialises or otherwise blocks = on barrages of DNS queries. But it is helpful - when the data needs to = come from ldap or whereever. Dw.