From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 27 19:41:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00AFE16A420; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 19:41:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua (tigra.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327C943D48; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 19:41:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from localhost (rocky.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.2]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9RJfYep034817; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 22:41:34 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua ([82.193.96.10]) by localhost (rocky.ipnet [82.193.96.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 84954-04; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 22:41:31 +0300 (EEST) Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9RJc3ru034717 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 27 Oct 2005 22:38:03 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.13.4/8.13.4) id j9RJc5AM093580; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 22:38:05 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 22:38:05 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Peter Jeremy Message-ID: <20051027193805.GT68470@ip.net.ua> References: <20051023105230.GA55181@frontfree.net> <20051023232935.GC602@dragon.NUXI.org> <20051024080811.GF39882@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GMArzDD+OGn24EFp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051024080811.GF39882@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ip.net.ua Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, delphij@delphij.net, developers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is it feasible to cross-build compat5x binary? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 19:41:47 -0000 --GMArzDD+OGn24EFp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 06:08:11PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Sun, 2005-Oct-23 16:29:35 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > >We should no trust cross built libraries for this purpose at this time. > >We really don't know how identical the results will be to being natively > >built. >=20 > At some stage, we need to validate our cross-build chain with cmp(1). > We can probably leverage off the work that NetBSD has done in this > area. This would significantly simplify the work involved in supporting > the various architectures. >=20 This has already been and being done. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --GMArzDD+OGn24EFp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDYSydqRfpzJluFF4RAlGHAJ0XWdbFI0gMKKMKdFKNFr+DwNVHBgCeN7yn 9CCYgAg/vIBTzJPqhdXAymY= =8JEs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GMArzDD+OGn24EFp--