From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 12 04:26:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358A51065679 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:26:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF4CE8FC20 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:26:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81507 invoked by uid 89); 12 Mar 2010 04:25:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.114?) (steve@ibctech.ca@::ffff:208.70.104.100) by ::ffff:208.70.104.210 with ESMTPA; 12 Mar 2010 04:25:49 -0000 Message-ID: <4B99C270.9040703@ibctech.ca> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:26:24 -0500 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: d@delphij.net References: <4B99AAD3.9060606@ibctech.ca> <4B99B197.3060504@ibctech.ca> <4B99B2E2.6050705@ibctech.ca> <4B99BB0E.7080000@delphij.net> In-Reply-To: <4B99BB0E.7080000@delphij.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Xin LI Subject: Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:26:35 -0000 On 2010.03.11 22:54, Xin LI wrote: > Weird, it seems that RELENG_8_0 do contain the correct file... What > does 'ident /etc/defaults/devfs.rules' show? ...not necessarily 8_0: %grep tag /etc/supfile *default tag=RELENG_8 fwiw: %ident /etc/defaults/devfs.rules /etc/defaults/devfs.rules: $FreeBSD: src/etc/defaults/devfs.rules,v 1.4.2.1.6.1 2009/04/15 03:14:26 kensmith Exp $ ...again... perhaps my arg list to mergemaster was the issue. If it was, it would be good to know ;) Otherwise, it was a standard src upgrade. Let me know if you need anything further. I can simulate the procedure on other hardware tomorrow to isolate the issue if you feel that this may affect others, or if it can prove that I was just sleeping on the job. Steve