Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:49:33 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Martin Wilke <miwi@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics Makefile ports/graphics/electrix Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist Message-ID: <20111119184933.GA23580@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4EC86921.5050902@FreeBSD.org> References: <201111191814.pAJIEru1046952@repoman.freebsd.org> <20111119183926.GA21664@FreeBSD.org> <4EC86921.5050902@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 02:42:41AM +0000, Martin Wilke wrote: > On Sat Nov 19 18:39:26 2011, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > >I believe we have a problem with PDF readers: some of such ports are being > >added to `graphics', while others to `print' (after adobe acrobat): > > > > graphics/epdfview > > graphics/gimp-manual-pdf > > graphics/gscan2pdf > > graphics/jpeg2pdf > > graphics/jpg2pdf > > graphics/mupdf > > graphics/pdf2svg > > graphics/rubygem-pdfkit > > graphics/svg2pdf > > graphics/xpdf > > > > print/a2pdf > > print/cups-pdf > > print/fpdf > > print/gspdf > > print/py-pdf > > print/py-trml2pdf > > > >I wonder if better consistency can be reached... > > Feel free to request repocopys :-). :-) Martin, the problem is not purely technical; I am also quite confused what is the best category for software that deals with pdf/dejavu files. Maybe this thread will spawn a discussion; I'd like to hear what others think about it. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111119184933.GA23580>