From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Feb 3 11:46:34 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA10261 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 11:46:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from misha.cisco.com (misha.cisco.com [171.69.206.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA10242 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 11:46:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mi@misha.cisco.com) Received: (from mi@localhost) by misha.cisco.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id OAA10950 for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 14:42:27 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi) From: Mikhail Teterin Message-Id: <199902031942.OAA10950@misha.cisco.com> Subject: mixing libraries To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 14:42:27 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: mi@aldan.algebra.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL52 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello! Is there a danger in mixing libc_r.so.3 => /usr/lib/libc_r.so.3 (0x2805f000) libm.so.2 => /usr/lib/libm.so.2 (0x280ed000) libtcl80.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libtcl80.so.1 (0x28107000) libreadline.so.3 => /usr/lib/libreadline.so.3 (0x2816a000) libtermcap.so.2 => /usr/lib/libtermcap.so.2 (0x2818c000) libutil.so.2 => /usr/lib/libutil.so.2 (0x28191000) libc.so.3 => /usr/lib/libc.so.3 (0x28199000) with libctk80.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libctk80.so.1 (0x28051000) libm.so.2 => /usr/lib/libm.so.2 (0x28086000) libncurses.so.3 => /usr/lib/libncurses.so.3 (0x280a0000) libtcl80.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libtcl80.so.1 (0x280b1000) libc.so.3 => /usr/lib/libc.so.3 (0x28114000) libmytinfo.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmytinfo.so.2 (0x28194000) in one executable? (Other the removing teh duplicates, of course). Thanks! -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message