From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct  2 14:55:34 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B300F16A417;
	Mon,  2 Oct 2006 14:55:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gurkan@linuks.mine.nu)
Received: from wiggis.ethz.ch (wiggis.ethz.ch [129.132.86.197])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6823E43D67;
	Mon,  2 Oct 2006 14:55:32 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gurkan@linuks.mine.nu)
Received: from wiggis2.ethz.ch (wiggis2.ethz.ch [192.168.127.3])
	by wiggis.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 491BC4494; Mon,  2 Oct 2006 16:55:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [195.176.50.50] (bludger.ethz.ch [195.176.50.50])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by wiggis.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EC9E2439C; Mon,  2 Oct 2006 16:55:29 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <45212861.4020102@linuks.mine.nu>
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:55:29 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCrkan_Seng=FCn?= <gurkan@linuks.mine.nu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060909)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ports@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at phys.ethz.ch
Cc: dinoex@freebsd.org
Subject: New top level category
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:55:34 -0000

Hello

> Typically, portmgr@ wants to see around fifty ports for a new top-
> level category to be created in the ports tree; it also helps if the
> relationship between the ports and/or their membership into this
> category is very obvious, which would seem to be the case for ports
> using GNUstep.

> If you would like to see this happen, the next step would be to
> identify all of the ports which would go under this new category and
> see what others think about the notion.

Here is a list of 50 gnustep/ ports. (the last five in the list
are not in yet, but there will probably a few other ports that
want to move into the gnustep category like some dockapps and
wmaker):

http://io.ethz.ch/~tar/freebsd/gnustep/ports.txt

Yours,
Gürkan