Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:08:12 -0500 (EST)
From:      Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
To:        ak03@gte.com
Cc:        tlambert2@mindspring.com, dfr@nlsystems.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: [PATCH: libc]Re: gnome on current
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.10.10210310907290.27891-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <20021031000501.3e20a6a6.kabaev@bellatlantic.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Alexander Kabaev wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 22:25:12 -0500 (EST)
> Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> wrote:
> 
> > > If last weak will win, the normal case when Xthrstub is loaded
> > > _after_ libc_r will break. The only way to really fix this is to
> > > export pthread_ symbols as strong in libc_r. Exporting them as weak
> > > sounds like is a mistake which should be fixed.
> > 
> > I disagree.  See Solaris 6, 7, 8 & 9 for an example.
> > 
> Cool. Then let's be consistent and follow Solaris all the way. Libc on
> Solaris provides full set of pthread_? functions which in turn call
> weakly defined _pthread_?? counterparts. libpthread in turn provides
> strong definitions for _pthread_??.

No, please see earlier messages in this thread.

-- 
Dan Eischen


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10210310907290.27891-100000>