From owner-freebsd-security Mon Dec 10 20: 6:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [216.33.66.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25D9837B416; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 20:06:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id A532081D01; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 22:06:29 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 22:06:29 -0600 From: Alfred Perlstein To: "Andrew R. Reiter" Cc: Mike Tancsa , security@FreeBSD.org, alc@FreeBSD.org, security-officer@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: AIO vulnerability (from bugtraq) Message-ID: <20011210220629.T92148@elvis.mu.org> References: <20011210202249.Q92148@elvis.mu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from arr@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 10:31:27PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * Andrew R. Reiter [011210 21:31] wrote: > > So your email stated that there was a security officer response? No, my email clearly stated that AIO is not on by default and has a large glaring blinking neon sign hanging off it stating use at your own risk. I thought it would painfully obvious that it doesn't require a security officer responce. -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' http://www.morons.org/rants/gpl-harmful.php3 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message