From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 12 18:01:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98DDD16A41F for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 18:01:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josh@oplink.net) Received: from mail.oplnk.net (smtp.oplink.net [216.90.3.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA7743D6D for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 18:01:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josh@oplink.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.oplnk.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75DB8762B1E for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:01:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.oplnk.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03093-01 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:01:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: from devious.oplink.net (devious.oplink.net [216.90.3.155]) by mail.oplnk.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E6E2762AF7 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:01:48 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:02:06 -0500 From: Joshua Bell To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20051012130206.7519f27d.josh@oplink.net> Organization: Optimal Link X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.2 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-and-Spam-Scanned: by oplink.net email shield Subject: Should gvinum be trusted? X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 18:01:57 -0000 Hi again, I would like to first thank all of you for your knowledge over the passed few days. It has been helpful, and my raid is setup. The only downside is that I am on 5.4-release and gvinum halts the kernel after I start it. This brings me to my question. With vinum package being around for quite sometime, and gvinum being 'young'. Is there any reason one should use gvinum over vinum at this time? I understand they both are basically the same, but gvinum appears to be missing important arguments (ie. resetconfig). Again, thank you all for your knowledge. -Josh