Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:07:27 +0100
From:      Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        svn-src-stable@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-stable-8@FreeBSD.org, Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r230174 - stable/8/sys/kern
Message-ID:  <20120115230727.GA67248@stack.nl>
In-Reply-To: <4F13563C.8060108@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201201152218.q0FMIsMS003166@svn.freebsd.org> <4F1354FA.1070300@FreeBSD.org> <4F13563C.8060108@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 02:42:04PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 01/15/2012 14:36, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > What happened.  There was a merge conflict.  I initially chose the
> > postpone option.  Then edited the file to get a correct merge.  Then
> > ran svn resolve. It complained that it needed --accept option, so I
> > used --accept=base.  I didn't do another svn diff after that before
> > committing the change and that was my mistake.  Apparently svn
> > resolve --accept=base changed the file.

> I'm pretty sure that after you've edited the file you want mine-full
> there, but the options to --accept confuse me as well (FWIW).

I think 'mine-full' means you want the version that was in the stable
branch before the MFC.

As shown in 'svn help resolved', the equivalent of 'svn resolved' is
'svn resolve --accept working'. I still prefer 'svn resolved' though as
it is less typing :)

I have also found the questions asked by 'svn merge' to be usable in
many cases.

-- 
Jilles Tjoelker



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120115230727.GA67248>