From owner-svn-src-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 15 23:07:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C0C106564A; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 23:07:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jilles@stack.nl) Received: from mx1.stack.nl (relay04.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAEC48FC12; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 23:07:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from snail.stack.nl (snail.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::131]) by mx1.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9EA81DDA7D; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:07:27 +0100 (CET) Received: by snail.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 1677) id A11AB28468; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:07:27 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:07:27 +0100 From: Jilles Tjoelker To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20120115230727.GA67248@stack.nl> References: <201201152218.q0FMIsMS003166@svn.freebsd.org> <4F1354FA.1070300@FreeBSD.org> <4F13563C.8060108@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F13563C.8060108@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: svn-src-stable@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-stable-8@FreeBSD.org, Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: svn commit: r230174 - stable/8/sys/kern X-BeenThere: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for all the -stable branches of the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 23:07:29 -0000 On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 02:42:04PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > On 01/15/2012 14:36, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > What happened. There was a merge conflict. I initially chose the > > postpone option. Then edited the file to get a correct merge. Then > > ran svn resolve. It complained that it needed --accept option, so I > > used --accept=base. I didn't do another svn diff after that before > > committing the change and that was my mistake. Apparently svn > > resolve --accept=base changed the file. > I'm pretty sure that after you've edited the file you want mine-full > there, but the options to --accept confuse me as well (FWIW). I think 'mine-full' means you want the version that was in the stable branch before the MFC. As shown in 'svn help resolved', the equivalent of 'svn resolved' is 'svn resolve --accept working'. I still prefer 'svn resolved' though as it is less typing :) I have also found the questions asked by 'svn merge' to be usable in many cases. -- Jilles Tjoelker