From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 2 14:56:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DCEF16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 14:56:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C422843D5D for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 14:56:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan.cojocar@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so1079767wra for ; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 06:56:01 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=U+xlM9Fk44jm8lT+MdAKuGztR9hXNxntdJVQhrT1DLAAIaWPlP5nFXPoG3h5qcgZC1Vy1MxpKOJ4BLZTqhvk8WPeMzUzm4SqW9xS48vA8FDJV+nglKh/sawC52axIjrAWkp0Tw7FDMDQPa2f34408JnVtRLcaEPTLxWTqCi8hCE= Received: by 10.54.35.35 with SMTP id i35mr1572208wri; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 06:56:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.26.4 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 06:56:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 17:56:01 +0300 From: Dan Cojocar To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050402111839.GA847@h1.d> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050329154013.B52981@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> <20050330104117.A52981@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> <20050330123458.T52981@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> <424C41C3.50705@root.org> <20050402111839.GA847@h1.d> cc: Gleb Kurtsov Subject: Re: Interrupt storm X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dan Cojocar List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 14:56:03 -0000 On Apr 2, 2005 2:18 PM, Gleb Kurtsov wrote: > On (31/03/2005 21:38), Dan Cojocar wrote: > > On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:30:27 -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: > > > Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dan Cojocar wrote: > > > > > > > >> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:53:48 -0500 (EST), Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dan Cojocar wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I tried running GENERIC and i get the following lor and watchdog > > > >>>> timeout, no interrupt storms: > > > >>> > > > >>> --- 8< --- --- 8< --- > > > >>> > > > >>>> Here is the full dmesg: http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt.generic > > > >>>> I tried also my kernel with apic, i don't get interrupt storms but > > > >>>> i get watchdog timeout message just like with GENERIC. > > > >>>> Here is the full dmesg: http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt.apic > > > >>>> And finally i tried my kernel without apic and without acpi, it's > > > >>>> running just fine, no interrupt storms, no watchdog timeout, but i > > > >>>> don't have acpi :(, here is the final > > > >>>> dmesg: http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt.noacpi. > if you want to get acpi you have to use old acpi pci link code. > cd sys/dev/acpica; cvs update -D 23-Nov-2004 -Pd acpi_pci[^.]* > it works fine for me with recent current. Thank you Gleb, i will try your suggestion. Dan