Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 12:58:56 +0100 From: Paul Richards <paul@freebsd-services.com> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org> Subject: Re: Base packaging Message-ID: <1063886336.33631.164.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20030918130949.7089031f.Alexander@Leidinger.net> References: <200309171445.h8HEjrh6065898@grimreaper.grondar.org> <1063812422.33631.104.camel@localhost> <20030918122510.50ea84c3.Alexander@Leidinger.net> <1063880911.33631.150.camel@localhost> <20030918130949.7089031f.Alexander@Leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 12:09, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 11:28:31 +0100 > Paul Richards <paul@freebsd-services.com> wrote: > > > > We have programs in the ports tree which use our bsd.*.mk > > > infrastructure. Will there be a problem if such a program gets installed > > > from ports (will it try to register itself 2 times)? > > > > I don't know, have you got an example port I can look at? > > sysutils/portupgrade for sure, probably games/freebsd-games and > net/freebsd-uucp too. No they won't. If there's no PORTNAME in the Makefile then the old mk files will behave the same as they always have. The way I'm doing it I modify the install target if PORTNAME is defined. Paul.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1063886336.33631.164.camel>