Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 20 May 1999 17:15:51 -0700
From:      Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
To:        Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.org>
Cc:        Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>, Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>, Tommy Hallgren <thallgren@yahoo.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Lazy SPLs 
Message-ID:  <199905210015.RAA01979@dingo.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "20 May 1999 19:17:42 CDT." <86wvy3wa1l.fsf@detlev.UUCP> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >>> "Lazy SPLs - The kernel no longer masks hardware events unless a
> >>> hardware event actually occurs, avoiding many expensive
> >>> operations."
> >> We've been doing it for as long as I can remember, at least as far
> >> back as 2.0.5, probably as far back as 1.x.
> > My earliest memory of it was as "Bruce's new interrupt code" for 386bsd.
> > It was part of the 386bsd patchkit I think.
> 
> Why mask out the interrupts at all, instead of queuing them in handler
> level?

Level-triggered interrupts are persistent conditions, not queueable 
events.  They typically require device-driver level intervention to be 
cleared.  This is a major error in the PCI design (no surprises there).

-- 
\\  The mind's the standard       \\  Mike Smith
\\  of the man.                   \\  msmith@freebsd.org
\\    -- Joseph Merrick           \\  msmith@cdrom.com




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199905210015.RAA01979>