From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Dec 19 18:55:18 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B621340A2D for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 18:55:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pete@nomadlogic.org) Received: from mail.nomadlogic.org (mail.nomadlogic.org [140.82.23.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nomadlogic.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DF188F27E; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 18:55:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pete@nomadlogic.org) Received: from duke.gem.co (cpe-76-175-75-27.socal.res.rr.com [76.175.75.27]) by mail.nomadlogic.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 89b7bda2 TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 10:55:15 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: The future of ZFS in FreeBSD To: Allan Jude , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20181219163033.jwm7opiwmdhbk6p3@mutt-hbsd> From: Pete Wright Message-ID: <2f62c721-843b-7e2e-d877-e780243f5d2e@nomadlogic.org> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 10:55:14 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5DF188F27E X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pete@nomadlogic.org designates 140.82.23.70 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pete@nomadlogic.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.60 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[27.75.175.76.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.10]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[nomadlogic.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE(-2.42)[ip: (-8.93), ipnet: 140.82.16.0/21(-4.47), asn: 20473(1.36), country: US(-0.08)]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mail.nomadlogic.org]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.87)[-0.866,0]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20473, ipnet:140.82.16.0/21, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 18:55:18 -0000 On 12/19/18 10:32 AM, Allan Jude wrote: > > The biggest thing to remember is that this is still OpenZFS, and still > run by the same developers as it has been. We are just commonizing on > the repo that has the most features integrated into it. > thanks for the clarification on this, as i was a bit confused as well. :) One question - is there a plan to rename things to not be linux specific, especially since it seems that this effort will result in the original goal of the OpenZFS repro (if I am reading things correctly)?  Or is that not going to happen because ZoL has the most commercial backing? It's probably a mute point - but I do take pride in the fact that FreeBSD has had support ZFS for so long and has allowed me to do things for my customers that I can't do on Linux...so I guess what I'm saying is I hope we don't loose credit for the hard work we've put into getting ZFS mainstream over the years :) Thanks! -pete -- Pete Wright pete@nomadlogic.org @nomadlogicLA