From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 16:52:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD107106564A; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:52:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C5F58FC0A; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:52:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [192.168.61.3]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F015DAC; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:52:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pBUGq5Ab029459; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:52:05 GMT (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: Kostik Belousov From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 30 Dec 2011 18:46:53 +0200." <20111230164653.GQ50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:52:05 +0000 Message-ID: <29458.1325263925@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: kan@freebsd.org, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav , Xin LI , arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fdlopen(3) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:52:08 -0000 In message <20111230164653.GQ50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>, Kostik Belousov writes: >> Has anybody racked their brains to make sure this doesn't have security >> implications ? > >I am wondering what kind of security consequences you have in mind ? I don't have anything specifically in mind, but adding a new way to communicate executable code always trigger my "is that really a good idea" detector... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.