From owner-freebsd-ia64 Fri Jan 10 16:16:58 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB15137B40C for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 16:16:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC5843E4A for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 16:16:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (athlon.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.3]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h0B0Gm2G024515; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 16:16:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h0B0GmBR001525; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 16:16:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h0B0GmHv001524; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 16:16:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 16:16:48 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Thomas Moestl Cc: Scott Long , re-builders@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Something's wrong with ports/devel... Message-ID: <20030111001648.GA1517@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <20030110214547.GA1100@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> <3E1F43AF.40002@btc.adaptec.com> <20030110222829.GA1196@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> <20030110224115.GE1732@crow.dom2ip.de> <20030110230233.GA1296@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> <20030110235016.GG1732@crow.dom2ip.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030110235016.GG1732@crow.dom2ip.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-ia64@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 12:50:16AM +0100, Thomas Moestl wrote: > > Put differently: is it the intention of the makefile writer to > > replace the value of ${_CPUCFLAGS} with the empty string or is > > it the intention to replace the literal "${_CPUCFLAGS} with the > > empty string? > > My first patch was bogus (I was fooled by the combination of :=, :S > and undefined values), the intent is to replace the value with the > empty string. I've committed a working fix now; of course, make should > probably just ignore S///g, but I guess that's nothing we want to fix > in RELENG_5_0 right now :) Ok. I'll wait until I see it labeled and restart the release. In the mean time I've posted a patch for make(1). As you say, it (the fix for make(1)) doesn't really have to go in 5.0-R, but it's good to have it discussed, argued, committed, backed-out and so on and so forth :-) Thanks for your help in nailing this down! -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ia64" in the body of the message