From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 27 17:11:53 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C489316A419; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:11:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.netplex.net (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD4813C474; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:11:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.netplex.net (8.14.1/8.14.1/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id l7RHBjt3026707; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:11:45 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.netplex.net) X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:11:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:11:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: Yar Tikhiy In-Reply-To: <20070827161002.GO21352@comp.chem.msu.su> Message-ID: References: <200708230509.l7N59VCi048341@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070825050637.GF99474@comp.chem.msu.su> <200708270939.48788.jhb@freebsd.org> <20070827161002.GO21352@comp.chem.msu.su> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, John Baldwin , Peter Jeremy , Alfred Perlstein , cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/gen fts-compat.c fts-compat.h X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:11:53 -0000 On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 09:39:47AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: >> On Saturday 25 August 2007 01:06:37 am Yar Tikhiy wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 06:25:17PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: >>>> I never added symbol versioning to libc in order to solve >>>> -current upgrade problems. Sure, you're free to use it that >>>> way, but it would not make me very happy ;-) >>> >>> You put it as though symbol versioning is your area of interest and >>> you just don't want any intruders to tamper with it. It wouldn't >>> have seemed so if there had been a well-defined policy on symbol >>> versioning usage somewhere on www.freebsd.org. >> >> No, there isn't a well-defined policy currently, feel free to write it >> down. :) > > I think I'll write it down when this issue has been settled and I have > enough input data. I like writing docs as I have rather poor long-term > memory and often consult my own texts. :-) I started a thread on -current for this with a link to my thoughts. -- DE