From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 8 00:31:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2826B37B401 for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 00:31:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from puffin.mail.pas.earthlink.net (puffin.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2BA43FB1 for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 00:31:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from user-38lc11n.dialup.mindspring.com ([209.86.4.55] helo=mindspring.com) by puffin.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19l1iN-0002e0-00; Fri, 08 Aug 2003 00:31:08 -0700 Message-ID: <3F335184.A84ECFDB@mindspring.com> Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 00:30:12 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Daniel C. Sobral" References: <1059854534.46751.0.camel@acheron.livid.de> <3F311492.9080309@tcoip.com.br> <3F31E42E.87379C0A@mindspring.com> <3F323FD7.6090903@tcoip.com.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a433fcc037dd8032a86cd6a170181e9be0a2d4e88014a4647c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: "Scott M. Likens" cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ACLS on UFS2 from FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE install. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 07:31:27 -0000 "Daniel C. Sobral" wrote: > You'll also notice I'm not questioning the _existence_ of ACL. My point > is that FreeBSD is Unix (no matter what the lawyers say), and people > don't usually think of ACL when they think of Unix. Ergo, enabling ACL > by defautl violates POLA. Not if you never *set* an ACL on anything. It's only when there are ACL's set on things that POLA may be violated. One presumes that an ACL has to be set on purpose... > And, in FreeBSD, POLA is king. > > (Or so we used to believe, no matter what we actually did. :) I'd be astonished if that weren't true. 8-) 8-). -- Terry