Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 23:15:41 -0400 From: Charlie Li <ml+freebsd@vishwin.info> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: editors/xed name collision Message-ID: <932b5a81-9005-d2bc-0fb2-bd2c82041f9e@vishwin.info> In-Reply-To: <CAP7rwcizVvVuOrH9N79BFEYu2gH4vrsaf=Az-GS-7gr37N0OUw@mail.gmail.com> References: <62836767-e190-20ce-f098-c96b402aa747@vishwin.info> <6f712817-de41-89a9-3ddb-23aabe470a49@vishwin.info> <CAP7rwcizVvVuOrH9N79BFEYu2gH4vrsaf=Az-GS-7gr37N0OUw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --d76zDk8gJSibvl1ZSt9ikd3gUPai4kNYo Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="zElwrr0xma09jOkroRNDVtKnkMr8opBOj"; protected-headers="v1" From: Charlie Li <ml+freebsd@vishwin.info> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Message-ID: <932b5a81-9005-d2bc-0fb2-bd2c82041f9e@vishwin.info> Subject: Re: editors/xed name collision References: <62836767-e190-20ce-f098-c96b402aa747@vishwin.info> <6f712817-de41-89a9-3ddb-23aabe470a49@vishwin.info> <CAP7rwcizVvVuOrH9N79BFEYu2gH4vrsaf=Az-GS-7gr37N0OUw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAP7rwcizVvVuOrH9N79BFEYu2gH4vrsaf=Az-GS-7gr37N0OUw@mail.gmail.com> --zElwrr0xma09jOkroRNDVtKnkMr8opBOj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB-large Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Adam Weinberger wrote: > Setting PORTNAME=3Dxed undoes any benefit of putting it in editors/x-ed= , > as the PKGBASE will conflict. >=20 The editors/x-ed location is merely temporary; I didn't even add it to INDEX pending a final consensus on what to do. > I agree that the current editors/xed looks completely abandoned (both > upstream and within the ports tree), and I have no objection to > replacing it. That said, I think the current port will need to be > deleted and the replacement svn add'ed. The port isn't actually being > "upgraded" to the new xed, and making the svn history seem that way > would serve no benefit. >=20 > Even though it's likely that nobody is using the current xed, it > really should have a deprecation notice (backported to quarterly), > even if it's short. >=20 Of course. The git diff shown doesn't do the whole process justice (hence "barring how git messed up file/path-level semantics"), as the new editors/xed actually needs repocopied from editors/gedit since xed originally forked from gedit. Putting a deprecation notice on the old editors/xed and MFHing it immediately sounds good. --=20 Charlie Li =E2=80=A6nope, still don't have an exit line. (This email address is for mailing list use; replace local-part with vishwin for off-list communication if possible) --zElwrr0xma09jOkroRNDVtKnkMr8opBOj-- --d76zDk8gJSibvl1ZSt9ikd3gUPai4kNYo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE/3/Cqr5a+41PbEb+jnB43vIDq2wFAly9Md4ACgkQjnB43vID q2xw4xAAqFFtS/cEA/BhM0qfLak4MKdLGjvbfTMebi+x9/GF1vLxbVBZZdkUvHJt 4Jx9MSB8Mn6kwa+GfqVBaXvdn98i1xo5b08FPD8AlCu94ZwC9pGz03l7WzZaBBQg /gYDqj+pAvcX7o73eO3u5/wap+gqeCTesQMr64WimdmmLJIIUAYf5p7GI1IK0cSv y1BjHc/Zy0l38Lhkpzsocs0nscEuf9hSWzjT6mbDJaEbwSiHdS4UOhrxNM8TsV0p dBWjaTLzpYFjdF7Zwvjrf6+ZROgnFovoBd4yNmTygGNgf82YK1htrdCFFuXvULx5 XLZPnrI8LG0KgrvYSyWZwfWL/oADl9QvapSprDAscXYbjyh2jDxQS9O8VsT5ez/d u+vhphsC+B3GQW8hqnHzRe8EaijyjVEx1oiqlXxmvSTfTgBgmklcMIerqxjn/aEL hDagzhn6vy7YVEYeifjxIsIKTrY24PDDp6gsqEDqiuaQWlKA5BzuIwTRHKxhXvRK iaMpnawqIa65uPkZTLyYiLS8Z2Zdpa4zAABDEHqojnZ/iKKr1nUy/OdOsJbYMCeJ 0Tj4v0tLE95xo8KyUdXtc1F2BuqHAsYkUq37lVa+ij0e5XsXAtu+XsIEQmDi/mvx K32qZg/asFKbivhzhIOLtFpu1DnWBKSj0Uxr2fd9quBp2JWVj8Y= =uBVP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d76zDk8gJSibvl1ZSt9ikd3gUPai4kNYo--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?932b5a81-9005-d2bc-0fb2-bd2c82041f9e>