From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 28 11:23:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0233D1065678 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:23:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AAF58FC13 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:22:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m7SBMpWQ064549; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:22:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m7SBMoQ3064546; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:22:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:22:50 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: prad In-Reply-To: <20080827172946.5a1d4103@gom.home> Message-ID: <20080828132206.P64545@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080827172946.5a1d4103@gom.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: defrag X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:23:00 -0000 > something that has puzzled me for years (but i've never got around to > asking) is how does *nix get away without regular defrag as with > windoze. because it doesn't need it. > > fsck is equivalent to scandisk, right? not exactly - fsck usually fix errors, unlike scandisk