From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 08:35:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05CD116A4CF for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 08:35:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay03.pair.com (relay03.pair.com [209.68.5.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F98D43D5A for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 08:35:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pho@holm.cc) Received: (qmail 7353 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2004 08:35:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO peter.osted.lan) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 3 Dec 2004 08:35:05 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 80.164.63.199 Received: from peter.osted.lan (localhost.osted.lan [127.0.0.1]) by peter.osted.lan (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iB38Z4Un093004; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 09:35:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pho@peter.osted.lan) Received: (from pho@localhost) by peter.osted.lan (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iB38YxkI093000; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 09:34:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pho) Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 09:34:58 +0100 From: Peter Holm To: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-ID: <20041203083458.GA92652@peter.osted.lan> References: <20041202155637.GA85127@peter.osted.lan> <98967.1102003088@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <98967.1102003088@critter.freebsd.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: current@freebsd.org cc: Jeff Roberson Subject: Re: SMP VFS Part 2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 08:35:07 -0000 On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 04:58:08PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20041202155637.GA85127@peter.osted.lan>, Peter Holm writes: > > >Just got a double panic again: http://www.holm.cc/stress/log/jeff06.html. > >I think I'll revert to HEAD, just to touch base. > > HEAD is not very happy on my testbox right now, recent ACPI commits seems > to have received less than meticulous scrutiny. > Hmm ... I've reverted Jeff's patch (so I'm now back to HEAD from Dec 1 10:04 UTC). I have not seen any buf related panics, during the last 16 of testing, only a few "sleeping thread owns a non-sleepable lock". Jeff, have you been able to recreate any of the panics I found? > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. -- Peter Holm