From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 00:48:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A35C71065673 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 00:48:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-f47.google.com (mail-qa0-f47.google.com [209.85.216.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58EFE8FC14 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 00:48:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qabg1 with SMTP id g1so1026719qab.13 for ; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 17:48:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ybmT87lexbIRjRSYxy1OWOr+Itjh1mhUNT8kiz7b1ZA=; b=trWKemrXWQtzRPTY48DU0lWZJIi+D2YweGrBMtxqRRGy9vQuV2m4KnXFTp9Dcy8T4W 1ohTqal4PtQPCEDYH7o2yqAhPX5ivQcYzaLoZlFdv4/PoK93RPUVcjjqL/ZoXtWbrzHv Ba9D9DC7zXO3ojSb6tjLQL9S1ciOprxvgkwfwIkBXxXAIqUO+Z5qIcgod3BtW0DQ9DC6 QuFmp+Y0bWFR/YJGhMZFLwD5QNQ5gh8uPDy2LzNskNOZVO5ZWMcT+f01r3P0bK1iS2Jx s7QTY6TSdeTIh95wlMTuC0d8qCdbgEKdy7LD/eieLeJKJS//u6I7vc0+J3cB1LBSIP9U o4pQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.179.18 with SMTP id bo18mr2624285qab.93.1338684492498; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 17:48:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.25.199 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 17:48:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120602223934.D0146106564A@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20120602223934.D0146106564A@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 18:48:11 -0600 Message-ID: From: Modulok To: Simon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Anyone using freebsd ZFS for large storage servers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 00:48:18 -0000 >> This thread confused me. Is the conclusion of this thread that ZFS is slow >> and breaks beyond recovery? I've personally experienced no problems with ZFS. The performance has been on par with UFS as far as I can tell. Sometimes it's a little faster, sometimes a little slower depending on the situation, but nothing dramatic on either end. -Modulok-