Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 01:36:47 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> To: Pierre-Luc Drouin <pldrouin@pldrouin.net> Cc: Freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Suggestion regarding config of ports Message-ID: <20060507013647.456f68bd@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <445D195E.2010208@pldrouin.net> References: <445D195E.2010208@pldrouin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 06 May 2006 17:47:10 -0400 Pierre-Luc Drouin <pldrouin@pldrouin.net> wrote: > Hi, > > I think it would be nice if there was a way for port maintainers to > specify if a port needs to be reconfigured. For example, today (May 6, > 2006) there has been an update of port lang/php4 and there is a new > option to choose if the apache module has to be compiled or not. If > there was a flag in the port system that allowed to force configuration > of the port if the installed version is less than a certain value, users > would have seen immediately that they had to check that new "Apache > module" option to have that module reinstalled... Yes, you're right. See last lines of mail/dspam[-devel]/Makefile for a possible implementation. I'm working on a more complete solution. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" BOFH excuse #442: Trojan horse ran out of hay
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060507013647.456f68bd>