From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 22:25:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A1D16A41F for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:25:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from msrv.matik.com.br (msrv.matik.com.br [200.152.83.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67B013C448 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:25:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from ap-h.matik.com.br (ap-h.matik.com.br [200.152.83.36]) by msrv.matik.com.br (8.14.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5BMPC6N057445 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:25:12 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) From: JoaoBR Organization: Infomatik To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:24:36 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <468d29450706110830k5faf022n9a417157bcf3f544@mail.gmail.com> <200706112058.l5BKwPlx075956@lava.sentex.ca> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706111924.36213.joao@matik.com.br> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, AWL, MR_DIFF_MID, SMILEY,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: Antispam Datacenter Matik msrv.matik.com.br X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.90.3, clamav-milter version 0.90.3 on msrv.matik.com.br X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: DDoS in FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE And Problen With The Clock X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:25:16 -0000 On Monday 11 June 2007 18:05:59 Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Jun 11, 2007, at 1:57 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > At 04:54 PM 6/11/2007, Chuck Swiger wrote: > > this unfortunate event by reordering instructions if needed, but if > > > >> you wrote your own assembly, you could in fact do a hardware DDoS if > >> you weren't careful. :-) > > > > Hi, > > I thought DDoS =3D _Distributed_ Denial of Service where > > multiple attacking devices gang up to attack a host. > > Yes, it is. > > > Is your example not just a plain old Denial of Service (DoS) ? > > Yes, as it stands. But if you ship this code to other machines, > perhaps it would then qualify as being _Distributed_....? :-) / 2 clever switch but still wrong ... DDoS is ONE target and multi-source but n= ot=20 multi-target and local source :) =2D-=20 Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br