From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 17 17:01:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7199D106567D; Tue, 17 May 2011 17:01:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itetcu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (worf.ds9.tecnik93.com [81.196.207.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256EB8FC0C; Tue, 17 May 2011 17:01:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (unknown [188.26.251.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0544222C5548; Tue, 17 May 2011 20:01:02 +0300 (EEST) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 20:01:01 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Andriy Gapon Message-ID: <20110517200101.6e5c6802@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <4DCFE689.3000904@FreeBSD.org> References: <20110515125252.5a90d966@ukr.net> <1305455213.2833.3.camel@crashalot.rainbow-runner.nl> <20110515140332.3acb7412@ukr.net> <20110515140755.6e833cd4@ukr.net> <20110515144556.292a0230@ukr.net> <20110515132530.GA6707@tinyCurrent> <4DCFE689.3000904@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/ZItFTB/tH8IE7oVeKwlEdZJ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.org, Daniele Mazzotti Subject: Re: skype 2.1.0.81; alternate versions of the Linuxolator v4l2 patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 17:01:03 -0000 --Sig_/ZItFTB/tH8IE7oVeKwlEdZJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 15 May 2011 17:43:21 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote: >=20 > I must also point out that at present the port most likely would > still complain that you need to update your system even if you have > all required commits.=20 Would it? I think not. If your OS is at current __FreeBSD_version for any of the 3 supported branches, it shouldn't. > In this case you would need to comment out the IGNORE=3D line. This is > because the ports do not check svn revisions (it would be very hard > to implement that correctly), but OSVERSION and I haven't bumped > __FreeBSD_version at the proper moments (and nobody reminded me about > that, unfortunately). Thought about it, but it's such a small change that it didn't seemed a bump was OK. --=20 IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B --Sig_/ZItFTB/tH8IE7oVeKwlEdZJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk3Sqc0ACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeW56gCeL81L0JmtMhiIWc1So+WC0Nco jB8AnA+DVHvc3giU4F+T8uRYjbs+0RDD =7tel -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/ZItFTB/tH8IE7oVeKwlEdZJ--