From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org  Thu Oct 15 18:01:09 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38DFBA1556C
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:01:09 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25A1DC8B
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:01:09 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t9FI19K1050111
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:01:09 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 199223] [PATCH] deskutils/ganttproject: Update to version 2.7.1
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:01:09 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: tkato432@yahoo.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-199223-13-ZntxdJKjce@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-199223-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-199223-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:01:09 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199223

--- Comment #9 from tkato432@yahoo.com ---
The argument would be persuasive if making use of something being
controversial should be avoided for the time being.

Anyway, this place does not seem appropriate to discuss the validity
of PORTDATA itself. I would like to continue using static plist for
this port at the moment.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.