From owner-freebsd-security Thu Jul 10 03:12:32 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id DAA22283 for security-outgoing; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 03:12:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (eivind@bitbox.follo.net [194.198.43.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA22266 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 03:12:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.5/8.7.3) id MAA02476; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 12:11:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 10 Jul 1997 12:11:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <199707101011.MAA02476@bitbox.follo.net> From: Eivind Eklund To: cschuber@uumail.gov.bc.ca, security@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Regards@uumail.gov.bc.ca, "Phone:'s message of Wed, 09 Jul 1997 14:50:43 -0700 Subject: Re: Divert Sockets References: <199707092150.OAA19064@passer.osg.gov.bc.ca> Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Are there any examples on the use of divert sockets to create an application > proxy? natd, and that is more or less it. And this question probably belong in -questions or potentially -hackers, not -security. Eivind.