From owner-freebsd-security  Mon Dec  9 12:41:33 1996
Return-Path: <owner-security>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id MAA29103
          for security-outgoing; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 12:41:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from itchy.atlas.com ([206.29.170.215])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id MAA29094
          for <security@freebsd.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 12:41:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from brantk@localhost) by itchy.atlas.com (8.8.0/8.8.0) id MAA13051; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 12:44:09 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199612092044.MAA13051@itchy.atlas.com>
Subject: Re: Running sendmail non-suid
To: adam@homeport.org (Adam Shostack)
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 12:44:09 -0800 (PST)
Cc: bmk@pobox.com, security@freebsd.org
Reply-To: bmk@pobox.com
In-Reply-To: <199612091950.OAA03744@homeport.org> from Adam Shostack at "Dec 9, 96 02:49:39 pm"
From: "Brant Katkansky" <bmk@pobox.com>
Reply-To: bmk@pobox.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

It's a possibility, but for various reasons that I am not at liberty
to discuss, I'd like to avoid using any software with restrictive
licensing policies.  GNU LGPL is OK, GPL is probably OK, Berkeley is OK,
anything else is very questionable.

> Why not use smap from the fwtk (ftp.tis.com) to bind to port 25, and
> then process the queued mail with sendmail?
> 
> Adam
> 
> 
> Brant Katkansky wrote: [about running sendmail non-suid]

-- Brant Katkansky (bmk@pobox.com, brantk@atlas.com)
   Software Engineer, ADC