From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Nov 12 13:09:02 1996 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA27294 for ports-outgoing; Tue, 12 Nov 1996 13:09:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from fps.biblos.unal.edu.co ([168.176.37.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA27274; Tue, 12 Nov 1996 13:08:31 -0800 (PST) From: pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co Received: from localhost by fps.biblos.unal.edu.co (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64/4.03) id AA19308; Tue, 12 Nov 1996 16:14:42 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 16:14:42 -0500 (EST) To: Satoshi Asami Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tcl 7.6 and Tk 4.2 In-Reply-To: <199611120732.XAA10603@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 11 Nov 1996, Satoshi Asami wrote: > > I'm afraid this should wait for the 2.2 release. I'm sure tcl-7.6 > will be imported into -current, then we can upgrade the tk port. > I`m not afraid :)...It isn`t really important which release changes the mess, my concern is that there is an official site for Tcl/Tk, and an official site for the contributed software, we should ensure that the new versions come almost exclusively from those sites so that we don`t have to keep up different versions for every application. The branches should be to actually help the ports being maintained, but with keeping Tcl/Tk and it`s apps distributed all over the tree it is very difficult, isn`t it? Pedro. > Satoshi >