From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Jul 19 21:24:07 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA27840
          for ports-outgoing; Sat, 19 Jul 1997 21:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usc.usc.unal.edu.co ([200.21.26.65])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA27834
          for <FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 19 Jul 1997 21:24:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unalmodem18.usc.unal.edu.co by usc.usc.unal.edu.co (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA15994; Sun, 20 Jul 1997 00:18:12 -0400
Message-Id: <33D1ADCA.7988@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 1997 23:18:50 -0700
From: Pedro Giffuni <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>
Reply-To: m230761@ingenieria.ingsala.unal.edu.co
Organization: U. Nacional de Colombia
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win16; I)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: Ian Vaudrey <ivaudrey@test.nemko.ltd.uk>
Cc: "Justin M. Seger" <jseger@freebsd.scds.com>, FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ports/4118: New Port: bind 8.1.1
References: <199707191111.HAA13753@freebsd.scds.com> <33D0FC06.30BF@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> <33D161AE.9B9D3449@test.nemko.ltd.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Ian Vaudrey wrote:
> 
> Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> >
> > Justin M. Seger wrote:
> > >
> > > I was thinking about pulling in bind-doc, but I wasn't sure whether
> > or not it
> > > was worth the extra 1 MB download.  I suppose we could have a
> > separate bind-doc
> > > port....
> > >
> > > Any suggestions?
> > >
> > Perhaps you should ask this in the documentation list, after all, the
> > place for BIND is the base distribution ;).
> >
> >         Pedro.
> >
> > > -Justin Seger-
> 
> I would agree that the place for bind-8 is in the base distribution, and
> would hope to see it there as soon as possible. But what about all the
> existing FreeBSD installations?
> 
$(PREFIX)/share/doc and as long as the conversion script is included
with the port, I don't think there will be problems.
What I'm saying is the documentation should either be forced with the
port or included in the base distribution as a step nearer to the final
adoption.


Pedro.

(BTW, my mail to Justin is bouncing badly :( )