Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:47:00 -0400 From: George Neville-Neil <gnn@neville-neil.com> To: pfg@freebsd.org Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, obrien@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r237624 - in head: cddl/contrib/opensolaris/cmd/dtrace/test/tst/common/llquantize cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libdtrace/common sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/dtrace sys/cddl/c... Message-ID: <FDE692FD-8E3B-47A5-80A3-7327135A7725@neville-neil.com> In-Reply-To: <1340991359.60778.YahooMailClassic@web113502.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <1340991359.60778.YahooMailClassic@web113502.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 29, 2012, at 13:35 , Pedro Giffuni wrote: > (Sorry for top-posting] >=20 > Actually ... >=20 > David pointed out a fundamental flaw on my part. >=20 > These are new files under a non-BSD license. Even when > they are only scripts used for testing I shouldn't have > brought them in without -core approval. >=20 > I will delete them right away and core shall decide > afterwards if and how they can be brought in. >=20 Are the files under a CDDL license? Since that's the point of where you = added them I don't think that that should be an issue. The issue comes when we = might ship CDDL code by default, but these are tests and so that should not be = a problem. If they're not CDDL then that is an issue. Best, George
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FDE692FD-8E3B-47A5-80A3-7327135A7725>