From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 4 06:36:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBFAF37B401 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 06:36:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mta7.pltn13.pbi.net (mta7.pltn13.pbi.net [64.164.98.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E9A44001 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 06:36:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hsu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (adsl-63-193-112-125.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.112.125]) by mta7.pltn13.pbi.net (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h64DaCeR019317; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 06:36:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200307041336.h64DaCeR019317@mta7.pltn13.pbi.net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: imp@bsdimp.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2003 06:37:58 -0700 From: Jeffrey Hsu cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Does newreno work as designed ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2003 13:36:23 -0000 > I've had to disable newreno on my machines as well. > have a wireless link to a DSL line, and I get much better > performance when I do that. I would go test wireless links, but if_wi stopped working for my notebook. There's only one outstanding bug that I know of with newreno and there's a patch in testing for that. You can find it in http://people.freebsd.org/~hsu/tmp/explicitnewreno.diff Please let me know if this has any effect on the problem you're seeing. Jeffrey