From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 20 19:46:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E0616A4CF; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:46:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua (tigra.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5356D43D46; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:46:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from localhost (rocky.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.2]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9KJkHVA035066; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 22:46:17 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua ([82.193.96.10]) by localhost (rocky.ipnet [82.193.96.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 78319-14; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 22:46:16 +0300 (EEST) Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9KJkAMU035057; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 22:46:13 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.13.1/8.13.1) id i9KJjlt8057155; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 22:45:47 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 22:45:47 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Max Laier Message-ID: <20041020194547.GD2195@ip.net.ua> References: <41767CF1.2020005@FreeBSD.org> <20041020.105839.100358845.imp@bsdimp.com> <20041020170907.GA1216@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <200410201913.42879.max@love2party.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DrWhICOqskFTAXiy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200410201913.42879.max@love2party.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ip.net.ua cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:46:19 -0000 --DrWhICOqskFTAXiy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 07:13:35PM +0200, Max Laier wrote: > Why is this discussion ongoing? The consensus seems pretty clear: "Implem= ent=20 > it, but have a make.conf option to turn it off." If there is concern with= =20 > this make if default to off and have an option to turn it on. >=20 Implementing this is very easy, since it's already implemented, just not by default. What everyone seem to have forgotten is that we also have modules, and in the "config -g" case, we also build debug versions of the modules. And if we're also going to install modules with debug symbols, I think this puts the requirement for the root file system way beyond the rational limits. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --DrWhICOqskFTAXiy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBdsBrqRfpzJluFF4RAsQXAJ4vqENfrkv3w/U5Q/9yXpFqD1JOYwCbByWV t183DjnuzwJwVO8XuyOhCSM= =ycNH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DrWhICOqskFTAXiy--