Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:11:49 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org> To: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com> Cc: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: misc/kde3-i18n* [was Re: HOLY COW! Ports grew by 130MB!] Message-ID: <20020424191149.GQ556@squall.waterspout.com> In-Reply-To: <3CC70027.8050306@owt.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0204240342150.36532-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <200204241418.11960.lauri@kde.org> <20020424131117.GL556@squall.waterspout.com> <3CC70027.8050306@owt.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 11:57:43AM -0700, Kent Stewart wrote: > There are times when I think that INDEX should be cleaned up. Everyone > is basically supposed to cvsup and portsdb -uU to rebuild it. The cvs > copy is now 10x larger than the file itself and cvsuping downloading > INDEX can take as long as the cvsuping the rest of ports-all. It *was* cleaned up about 1-3 months ago. Joe K. basically clipped out all of the revisions that: a. were not tagged b. did not contain any interesting/useful log messages c. were before a certain revision number and not (a) or (b) I believe this cut down the size of the file by about 40%+. Regards, -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020424191149.GQ556>