From owner-freebsd-alpha Mon May 22 1:43:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.90]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2215C37BBBF for ; Mon, 22 May 2000 01:43:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Received: from nlsys.demon.co.uk ([158.152.125.33] helo=herring.nlsystems.com) by anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 12tno3-000ACg-0W; Mon, 22 May 2000 09:43:23 +0100 Received: from salmon.nlsystems.com (salmon.nlsystems.com [10.0.0.3]) by herring.nlsystems.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA10646; Mon, 22 May 2000 09:49:25 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 09:49:10 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson To: Alexander Langer Cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: device ed (PCI) on alphas In-Reply-To: <20000521210017.A28197@cichlids.cichlids.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 21 May 2000, Alexander Langer wrote: > [ Sorry, -net was wrong. ] > > To follow up myself: The NIC shares an IRQ with the fdc, if that > matters. Just after sending the last reply I realised that this is a PCI ed device which changes things. Often alphas have two different interrupt numbering systems, one for PCI and one for ISA so if a PCI device appears to have the same irq as an ISA device, there probably is no conflict. I don't know what is the real problem with your NIC though, sorry. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 20 8442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message