From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Apr 27 16:00:02 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA02352 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Mon, 27 Apr 1998 16:00:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA02316; Mon, 27 Apr 1998 16:00:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 16:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199804272300.QAA02316@hub.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports Cc: From: Brett Taylor Subject: Re: ports/6358: New port of AfterStep-1.4.4 Reply-To: Brett Taylor Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/6358; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Brett Taylor To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Subject: Re: ports/6358: New port of AfterStep-1.4.4 Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 16:54:07 -0600 (MDT) Holy cow. STOP the presses (not that anyone appears to be close to committing this). The AS people have released a new version, which fixes some of the bugs from before but ... good grief they have a HUGE mess in the patches to get to the fixed version - I don't even want to go into that. I'll try to get this newer, mostly fixed version ported by the end of the week. For now maybe set AS-1.0 unbroken. And I KNOW this is gonna be a problem but until AS-1.4.* becomes more stable can we rename the port that's sitting there waiting to be patched against, afterstep-devel (much like the gimp used to be)? I don't have a whole lot of experience with CVS so maybe backing the 1.4.4 name out isn't possible. Even afterstep-1.4 would be better. ********************************************************* Brett Taylor brett@peloton.physics.montana.edu http://peloton.physics.montana.edu/brett/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message