From owner-freebsd-current Mon Nov 30 05:30:24 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA25890 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 30 Nov 1998 05:30:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (ppp7.portal.net.au [202.12.71.107]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA25871; Mon, 30 Nov 1998 05:30:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA00828; Sun, 29 Nov 1998 01:51:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199811290951.BAA00828@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Bruce Evans cc: jc@irbs.com, mike@smith.net.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG, smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Dog Sloooow SMP In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 08 Nov 1998 13:43:52 +1100." <199811080243.NAA32642@godzilla.zeta.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 01:51:42 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > >No idea. I've received verification that fixing this for all 686-class > >CPUs seems to work (ie. it's OK on the Cyrix MII and doesn't appear to > >impact performance there), so the tests are now generalised for the > >entire 686-class. > > It's only OK for MII's because of various `#if 0's and `#ifdef SMP's > that prevent non-OK code from running on MII's. Care to comment on which operations aren't OK? I did ask for this in the review phase, with no feedback. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message