From owner-freebsd-security  Thu Aug 17 19:07:49 1995
Return-Path: security-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id TAA23565
          for security-outgoing; Thu, 17 Aug 1995 19:07:49 -0700
Received: from beta.wsl.sinica.edu.tw (beta.wsl.sinica.edu.tw [140.109.7.2])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with SMTP id TAA23558
          for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Thu, 17 Aug 1995 19:07:42 -0700
From: ywliu@beta.wsl.sinica.edu.tw
Message-Id: <199508180207.TAA23558@freefall.FreeBSD.org>
Received: by beta.wsl.sinica.edu.tw
	(1.37.109.8/16.2) id AA13155; Fri, 18 Aug 1995 09:56:21 +0800
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 1995 09:56:21 +0800
To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: (fwd) CERT Advisory CA-95:08 - Sendmail v.5 Vulnerability
Newsgroups: comp.security.announce
Sender: security-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

:Newsgroups: comp.security.announce
:
:=============================================================================
:CA-95:08                          CERT Advisory
:                                  August 17, 1995
:                            Sendmail v.5 Vulnerability
:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[snipped]
:    Public domain:
:     Users of the public domain operating systems Linux (systems using
:     sendmail rather than smail), NetBSD, and FreeBSD should upgrade to
:     sendmail 8.6.12. 

I just wonder I am using 2.05R, do I need to switch to sendmail 8.6.12 ?

BSDI provides a sendmail patch for their BSD/OS 2.0, if FreeBSD 2.05 uses
the same sendmail, should we need patch too ?

--
Yen-Wei Liu 
Internet e-mail address:ywliu@beta.wsl.sinica.edu.tw
			ywliu@gate.sinica.edu.tw
FAX: +886-2-783-6444

How to make home-brewing Win95 : Get yourself a new box and put your DOS 5.0 
				 and Win 3.1 inside.