From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 19 22:40:09 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968511065686;
	Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:40:09 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jilles@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6978D8FC14;
	Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:40:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9JMe9Go022653;
	Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:40:09 GMT
	(envelope-from jilles@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from jilles@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p9JMe9J0022649;
	Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:40:09 GMT (envelope-from jilles)
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:40:09 GMT
Message-Id: <201110192240.p9JMe9J0022649@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org, jilles@FreeBSD.org,
	freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, jilles@FreeBSD.org
From: jilles@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: bin/161756: [patch] sh(1) /bin/sh: read files in 1024-byte
	chunks rather than 1023
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:40:09 -0000

Synopsis: [patch] sh(1) /bin/sh: read files in 1024-byte chunks rather than 1023

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: jilles
State-Changed-When: Wed Oct 19 22:33:38 UTC 2011
State-Changed-Why: 
Although this change looks like an improvement, it does not seem
fully satisfying. I would like to see performance numbers for the
change on your slow embedded platform. Also, why use 1023 or 1024?
Another buffer size may be better.


Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->jilles
Responsible-Changed-By: jilles
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Oct 19 22:33:38 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
Take.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=161756