Date: Sat, 28 Dec 1996 23:49:00 +0200 (EET) From: Ville Eerola <Ville.Eerola@vehome.pp.sci.fi> To: Masafumi NAKANE/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2Y6LDJtSjgbKEI=?= <max@wide.ad.jp> Cc: asami@cs.berkeley.edu, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/fetchmail Makefile ports/mail/fetchmail/filesmd5 Message-ID: <199612282149.XAA00485@h.ve.sci.fi> In-Reply-To: <199612281239.VAA12151@mail.tky007.tth.expo96.ad.jp> References: <199612281230.EAA09890@baloon.mimi.com> <199612281239.VAA12151@mail.tky007.tth.expo96.ad.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Masafumi NAKANE writes: > asami> Oh, did that come from the maintainer? I thought it was > asami> you that did it. :) > > Well, I don't remember who proposed this change. It may be me, but I > remember that the maintainer sent in to say this change was a good > idea or something like that. Me neither ;-) Anyways, you seem to have committed the change into Revision 1.4 of the fetchmail-port Makefile... This was during fetchmail-1.9 pl## (patch of the day). Now its development style seems to be more like the release of the day ;-) > So I figure it would be better to change > this policy with the maintainer's permission. Well... I have somewhat mixed feelings about this. For the current situation it is ok, but who knows what esr will do when we reach 2.9, and we begin approaching fetchmail-3.0? Maybe it is best to do the change now, and if the patchlevels start reappearing change it back again. > Max Regards, Ville -- Ville Eerola | Powered by ve@sci.fi | FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199612282149.XAA00485>