From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Feb 24 13:41:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from pefstud.uniag.sk (pefstud.uniag.sk [193.87.98.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A7411FBA for ; Wed, 24 Feb 1999 13:37:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kostal@pefstud.uniag.sk) Received: from localhost (kostal@localhost) by pefstud.uniag.sk (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA75404 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 1999 09:09:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from kostal@pefstud.uniag.sk) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 09:09:21 +0100 (CET) From: Ladislav Kostal To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DHCP In-Reply-To: <36D24F1E.E9890314@seattleu.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 22 Feb 1999, Eric Hodel wrote: > Try the ports tree ISC-DHCP, or WIDE-DHCP I was using WIDE-DHCP (which was working fine), but I had one problem and had to stop using it. When w95 client boot up, it correctly asked and got all needed from server, it can use all TCP/IP services, and in Network Neighbourhood there were also some computers on SMB protocol, BUT not all, as in case, when client had all IP stuff hard coded (= without DHCP). We are using some kind of information system, which run on SMB and just that host was not visible nor findable. Why ? I can ping it, but not find as shared computer. When switched back to hard-coded IP, it was ok. Is it problem of SMB protocol or DHCP ? Ladislav Kostal To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message