From owner-freebsd-net  Tue May 12 17:10:23 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA01236
          for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 12 May 1998 17:10:23 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from silver.sms.fi (silver.sms.fi [194.111.122.17])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA00646;
          Tue, 12 May 1998 17:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from pete@silver.sms.fi)
Received: (from pete@localhost) by silver.sms.fi (8.8.8/8.7.3) id DAA08559; Wed, 13 May 1998 03:06:13 +0300 (EEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 03:06:13 +0300 (EEST)
From: Petri Helenius <pete@sms.fi>
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Cc: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org>, peter@netplex.com.au (Peter Wemm),
        dag-erli@ifi.uio.no, net@FreeBSD.ORG, core@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: INRIA IPv6 on FreeBSD 
In-Reply-To: <2990.894997902@time.cdrom.com>
References: <199805121802.UAA18013@gvr.gvr.org>
	<2990.894997902@time.cdrom.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs  Lucid
Message-ID: <13656.58219.715765.24138@silver.sms.fi>
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Jordan K. Hubbard writes:
 > > From what I've heart, the INRIA stack is indeed a good one so I would
 > > opt for the INRIA one (I do not have personal experience with it though).
 > 
 > And that's the real essence of the problem here...  Most of the people
 > who've even bothered to formulate an opinion on this issue so far have
 > also yet to actually seriously _look_ at any of the available
 > implementations. :-(

I've been using the INRIA stuff for >6 months now and I'm happy with
that with the exception of the pain I've to go through when I need to
match -stable patches to the INRIA code which gets up-ported only
every now and then. 
 > 
 > I appreciate that people's time is limited, especially for
 > bleeding-edge issues like IPv6, but perhaps a working group could be
 > formed at this point to go actually study the various options far more
 > substantially before we move on to the stage of talking seriously
 > about committing anything?
 > 
IPv6 is going to hit the road sometime later this year and it'd be sad 
to see freebsd sitting on a bus stop at that time.

Pete


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message