Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 17:09:33 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: John Kozubik <john@kozubik.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS2 snapshots - comments requested Message-ID: <20060309220933.GA97622@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20060308151738.L55438@kozubik.com> References: <20060308151738.L55438@kozubik.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 03:55:23PM -0800, John Kozubik wrote: > - is this instability (circa 6.0) acknowledged ? Yes > - is there a large, known problem that, when fixed, will cause all of > these little problems to go away, or should I keep submitting PRs when I > verify misc. problems ? >=20 > - can any visibility be offered as to the possible future viability of > UFS2 snapshots in 6.0 ? Recent (and near future) commits to RELENG_6 should help a lot, so 6.1-RELEASE will hopefully be (more) usable in this regard. Kris --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEEKedWry0BWjoQKURAtSqAJ4pPsqbmCEDhLQMNqStJMvRrW6zIgCgzEOn zJ9+QlP5kgb+fXpM9kFIGmM= =seYa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060309220933.GA97622>