From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Nov 17 05:00:36 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5DEC47FB52 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 05:00:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from p-impout009.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net (p-impout009aa.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net [47.43.26.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CZv032tmjz3PnH for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 05:00:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from localhost ([96.28.177.163]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id et6Wkiay5xzwQet6Wk1ZlF; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 05:00:33 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=AtOQI91P c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=xqrt2BZAGHte7XHhrxJgbA==:117 a=xqrt2BZAGHte7XHhrxJgbA==:17 a=HpEJnUlJZJkA:10 a=kTFOTQGJQHt4JXjAkusA:9 Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 05:00:37 +0000 From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: in -current is svn still canonical? References: <5fb33a11.1c69fb81.2d2a6.f92eSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfOVF5wBibtpjw28E39cyeF5CkAieFEBE4LNFNFIT8a3ZeNSl95/b5OYaLWhl7hGqRDz9l6V4T6UpwJUH4K7iWI8IVrfRs7CB2Lb5Qr9Rg6nPU/ERTvqv vqUbzpCSxz34EoRl/yoPm3pgd6kHTlyTyYFnCdCg+FGp5XammwMs12Z8 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CZv032tmjz3PnH X-Spamd-Bar: ++ X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.15 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[twc.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:47.43.26.0/24]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[96.28.177.163:received]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[twc.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:40294, ipnet:47.43.24.0/21, country:US]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[47.43.26.140:from]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.995]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[twc.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[47.43.26.140:from:127.0.2.255]; MISSING_MID(2.50)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.95)[0.949]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[47.43.26.140:from]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 05:00:36 -0000 > Subversion is the source of truth for FreeBSD today. > In the near future, likely early next month, we'll move our operations over > to git. Git will be the source of truth after the flag day. All developer > operations will be in git: committing to current, and MFCing will all be > done with git. As an aide to users that started the FreeBSD stable/11 and > stable/12 branches, however, we'll be exporting the commits to the git > branch stable/11 and stable/12 to subversion. The subversion tree will > otherwise be read-only after this date. > The doc tree will likely convert at the same time that the src tree moves > over. There will likely be a lag for the ports tree. It's unclear if they > will switch at the same time as the src tree, or if there will be a > few-months-long lag. > Warner Thanks for the information, but if you feel the need to send me a not-quite-CC, please don't send me the multipart/alternative version when you send the plain-text version to the list. I hate multipart/alternative! When git becomes the source of truth on FreeBSD after the flag day, will it be necessary to git-clone the whole tree from scratch, or will there be a conversion tool to switch the svn download to proper git format? The doc tree is much smaller than the src tree, while the ports tree is much bigger than the src tree. Is that the reason for the few-months-long lag switching the ports trree to git? Tom