Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 23:13:51 -0800 (PST) From: Annelise Anderson <andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu> To: "Jonathan E. Lyons" <parrothd@midwest.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Web Server Log Analysis Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971120230235.11295B-100000@andrsn.stanford.edu> In-Reply-To: <1.5.4.32.19971118153634.008e0cc8@midwest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 18 Nov 1997, Jonathan E. Lyons wrote: > I've had great success with http-analyze, when I was the admin of a small > ISP we used it to creat the stats pages for over 100 web servers, all on one > BSDI machine. Current I've got it running on my 2.2.2 machine, the only > drawback is the number of log files, but you could disable it.. :) If you > need a working example try.. > > http://cplkagan.globaleyes.net/stats/ I looked at the stats there, and actually I wanted something that could be configured to do more--e.g., to give me a distribution of the referers or sources (where the hits are coming from) for particular files (or directories). What the 'bots are doing and how often.... Actually I know what my problem is--I'm running out of space and I'm reluctant to install all three of them and try them, but that's what I really should do. Thanks! Annelise > > At 07:00 AM 11/18/97 -0800, Annelise Anderson wrote: > >There are three programs for analyzing www logs, and I'm just wondering > >how they differ: > > > > wwwstat > > analog > > http-analyze > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.971120230235.11295B-100000>